About this deal
If you're using a source from Oxford Reference Online, there will often be an author. In the footnote reference, the author name should be first name followed by surname, e.g. Simon White. The bibliography needs to be arranged alphabetically by author surname, so always reverse the name of the first author in the bibliography reference, e.g. White, Simon. Subsequent authors should be first name followed by surname. urn:oclc:489869402 Republisher_date 20120717141333 Republisher_operator [email protected];[email protected] Scandate 20120716075651 Scanner scribe11.shenzhen.archive.org Scanningcenter shenzhen Worldcat (source edition)
The first edition of The Norton Anthology of English Literature, printed in 1962, comprised two volumes. Also printed in 1962 was a single-volume derivative edition, called The Norton Anthology of English Literature: Major Authors Edition, which contained reprintings with some additions and changes including 28 of the major authors appearing in the original edition. [2] 7th edition [ edit ] Damrosch, David (2001). "Roundtable: The Mirror and the Window: Reflections on Anthology Construction". Pedagogy: Critical Approaches to Teaching Literature, Language, Composition, and Culture. 1: 207–214. doi: 10.1215/15314200-1-1-207. S2CID 145511012. If there's no author, do not use 'Anon.' Instead start the footnote reference with the title of the article. In the bibliography, list the source by article title, ignoring initial definite or indefinite articles.
Lccn 96008035 Ocr ABBYY FineReader 11.0 Ocr_converted abbyy-to-hocr 1.1.7 Ocr_module_version 0.0.13 Openlibrary_edition Bibliography example: Kenton, Tristam, Kate Fleetwood (Medea) in 'Medea' by Euripides at Almeida Theatre. Directed by Rupert Goold, 2015, photograph, Bridgeman Education, image no. KNT3814693
Robert Pinsky once told an interviewer that the present is always overrated. This fact seems to be the greatest dilemma facing the editors of anthologies. Anthologists have the probably impossible task of selecting poems that are simultaneously of high quality, diverse, representative of a culture/language /subject, and important for the reader. The problem is that these criteria do not always overlap—in fact, they often contradict each other. I suspect that, in the midst of this confusing conflict, relevance is easily confused for importance. As a result, Shakespeare or Katherine Philips end up buried beneath an avalanche of contemporary writers.Footnote example: Tristam Kenton, Kate Fleetwood (Medea) in 'Medea' by Euripides at Almeida Theatre. Directed by Rupert Goold, 2015, photograph, Bridgeman Education, image no. KNT3814693